608 So. 2d 912 - Hierro v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently November 2015 · most notably 657 So. 2d 1152 - Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases (95-1) (1995), Calliar v. State (1999)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 383 So. 2d 219 - Eutsey v. State · 608 So. 2d 784 - Fotopoulos v. State · 360 So. 2d 1244 - Miles v. State · 531 So. 2d 708 - Thomas v. State · 500 So. 2d 519 - Lawhorne v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n order for the State to establish that the screwdriver was a burglary tool, the State needed to adduce testimony showing that the defendant used, or actually intended to use, the screwdriver to commit a burglary or a trespass.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“In order for the State to establish that the screwdriver was a burglary tool, the State needed to adduce testimony showing that the defendant used, or actually intended to use, the screwdriver to commit a burglary or a trespass. [Thomas v. State, 531 So.2d 708 , (Fla.1988) ]; see §§ 810.02, 810.06, 810.08, Fla. Stat. (1991). There was no evidence at trial from which the jury could find that the defendant used the screwdriver to gain entry to the vehicle, nor evidence from which the jury could determine that the defendant possessed the screwdriver with the intent to use it to gain entry to the vehicle. That being so, the conviction under section 810.06 must be reversed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Baker v. State · A.R.M. v. State“[w]hoever has in his possession any tool, machine, or implement with intent to use the same ... to commit any burglary or trespass shall be guilty of a felony of the third degree....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.