Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 608 So. 2d 966 - State v. Bernard

608 So. 2d 966 - State v. Bernard’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
9
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably Alvarado v. State (1995), 684 So. 2d 368 - State v. Seals (1996)

45 state decisions

2301992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Payne v. Tennessee · Booth v. Maryland · Dawson v. Delaware · South Carolina v. Gathers · 422 So. 2d 95 - State v. Sawyer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “some evidence of the murder victim's character and of the impact of the murder on the victim's survivors is admissible as relevant to the circumstances of the offense or to the character and propensities of the offender.”
    20 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “The sentencing hearing shall focus on the circumstances of the offense, the character and propensities of the offender, and the impact that the death of the victim has had on family members.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “a limited amount of general evidence providing identity to the victim and a limited amount of general evidence demonstrating harm to the victim's survivors”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.