Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 608 S.W.2d 767 - Mayfield v. Smith

Mayfield v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2010

12 state decisions

401980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In the Interest of G. M. · Wiley v. Spratlan · H. W. J. v. State Department of Public Welfare · Compasano v. State · In the Interest of Hare

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “course of conduct which has the effect of placing or allowing the children to remain in conditions which endanger their physical or emotional well-being, a judgment terminating the parent-child relationship may be justified.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “that appellant, while confined in prison, could have sent for child support part of such funds as were sent to him by his family for toilet articles not furnished by the State”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re LJN

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.