Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 608 S.W.2d 928 - Ex Parte Alexander

Ex Parte Alexander’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 2010

16 state decisions

1001980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burns v. State · Smith v. State · Garcia v. State · Adams v. State · Milton v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether there is a probability that the defendant would commit criminal acts of violence that would constitute a continuing threat to society; and (2) in cases in which the jury charge at the guilt or innocence phase permitted the jury to find the defendant guilty as a party under sections 7.01 and 7.02, Penal Code, whether the defendant actually caused the death of the deceased or did not actually cause the death of the deceased but intended to kill the deceased or another or anticipated that a human life would be taken.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “‘proof is evident’ means that the evidence is clear and strong, leading a well-guarded and dispassionate judgment to the conclusion that the offense of capital murder has been committed; that the accused is the guilty party; and that the jury will return findings which will require a sentence of death.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “not to set out the facts in detail or comment on the sufficiency of the evidence prior to trial on the merits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.