In Re CS’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 district · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2019
2 district · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 671 (§ 471 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on State v. Baldwin · State v. Hamlin · Hill v. Conway · Association of Texas Professional Educators v. Kirby · Schultze v. Landmark Hotel Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We may correct a statute whose language does not promote the intent of the Legislature due to clerical error in transcription, writing, or redrafting.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The bedrock rule of statutory construction is to determine and give effect to the intent of the Legislature.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to interpret statutes so as to give them effect,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.