Gullo v. Califano’s Empirical Analysis
609 F.2d 649 · 1979
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently February 2015 · most notably Townley v. Heckler (1984), Cowart v. Schweiker (1981)
18 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Lonzollo v. Weinberger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Secretary's reliance upon such reports ... has been held to invalidate a decision denying benefits where the claimant was afforded no opportunity to subpoena and cross-examine the declarant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“it is not uncommon for the ALJ to receive reports subsequent to the administrative hearing,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cowart v. Schweiker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.