Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 609 F.2d 695 - Eder v. Beal

Eder v. Beal’s Empirical Analysis

609 F.2d 695 · 1979

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably 855 F. Supp. 1123 - Sobky v. Smoley (1994), Roe v. Casey (1980)

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

23019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Edelman v. Jordan · Shapiro v. Thompson · Quern v. Jordan · J. I. Case Co. v. Borak · Rosado v. Wyman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[O]nce a state elects to participate in an 'optional' program, it becomes bound by the federal regulations which govern it.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(a) A statement of what action the State, skilled nursing facility, or nursing facility intends to take; (b) The reasons for the intended action; (c) The specific regulations that support, or the change in Federal or State law that requires, the action; (d) An explanation of— (1) The individual’s right to request an evidentiary hearing if one is available, or a State agency hearing; or (2) In cases of an action based on a change in law, the circumstances under which a hearing will be granted; and (e) An explanation of the circumstances under which Medicaid is continued if a hearing is requested.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “means that the notice is mailed at least 10 days before the date of action, that is, the date upon which the action would become effective; (B)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.