Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

609 F.2d 824

Docket No. 77-3454.

Ledoux v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Jan. 11, 1980.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Feb. 12, 1980.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1980-01-11

2 counsel of record

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“crash of (a) helicopter, while it (is) being used in place of a vessel to ferry personnel and supplies to and from offshore drilling structures, bears the type of significant relationship to traditional maritime activity which is necessary to invoke admiralty jurisdiction.”

quoted by 2 later decisions, including 618 F. Supp. 339 - Holcomb v. ERA Helicopters, Inc., Smith v. Pan Air Corp.

Relies on Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of Cleveland · Mobil Oil Corporation v. Higginbotham K · Higginbotham v. Mobil Oil Corp.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1980-01-11

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably Smith v. Pan Air Corp. (1982), Tallentire v. Offshore Logistics, Inc. (1985)

15 federal appellate · 5 district ·

2301980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1James L. Wheeler, New Orleans, La., for plaintiffs-appellants.

¶2McGlinehey, Stafford, Mintz & Hoffman, Dermot S. McGlinehey, William V. Dalferes, Jr., New Orleans, La., for defendants-appel-lees Petroleum Helicopters & Aetna Cas. & Surety Co.

¶3Before CHARLES CLARK, RONEY and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5The survivors of the pilot of a helicopter, killed in a crash at sea, suffered dismissal of their action for damages on the grounds that the Workmen’s Compensation laws of Louisiana provided the exclusive remedy. Because of intervening decisions, we reverse.

¶6Executive Jet Aviation, Inc., v. City of Cleveland, Ohio, 409 U.S. 249, 93 S.Ct. 493, 34 L.Ed.2d 454 (1972), established that the crash of a land-based aircraft on a flight between points within the continental United States could not invoke admiralty jurisdiction merely because the plane crashed in navigable waters. The Court held that admiralty jurisdiction required not only maritime situs, but also maritime status, i. e., a significant relationship to traditional maritime activity.

¶7The crash of the deceased’s helicopter, while it was being used in place of a vessel to ferry personnel and supplies to and from offshore drilling structures, bears the type of significant relationship to traditional maritime activity which is necessary to invoke admiralty jurisdiction. Higginbotham v. Mobil Oil Co., 357 F.Supp. 1164, 1167 (W.D.La.1973), aff’d in part, rev’d in part, 545 F.2d 422, 424 n.l, rev’d on other grounds, 436 U.S. 618, 98 S.Ct. 2010, 56 L.Ed.2d 581 (1978). (See 98 S.Ct. 2012, n.2).

¶8Because maritime jurisdiction exists, the exclusive remedy provision of the Louisiana Workmen’s Compensation statutes cannot control the rights of the parties. Thibo-daux v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 580 F.2d 841 (5th Cir. 1978). The judgment appealed from is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration of the cause of action pled.

¶9VACATED and REMANDED.

/609/f2d/824 · .json · Public domain