Murthy v. Vilsack’s Empirical Analysis
609 F.3d 460 · 2010
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 12 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 28 U.S.C. § 1631 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan · Brown v. General Services Administration · Iam National Pension Fund Benefit Plan v. Industrial Gear Manufacturing Company · Martini v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n · Weber v. Battista
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“issues not raised before judgment in the district court are usually considered to have been [forfeited] on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“wait 180 days, absent final action by the EEOC, before filing a lawsuit in the federal district court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.