Bailey v. Cain’s Empirical Analysis
609 F.3d 763 · 2010
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp. · Smith v. Barry · Jimenez v. Quarterman · United States v. Cantwell · Mosley v. Cozby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Cruzado's] motion for an extension of time to file a memorandum in support of a request for COA should not be construed as the functional equivalent of a notice of appeal in the particular circumstances of this case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cruzado v. Alves
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.