609 F. Supp. 601 - Binkley v. Sheaffer’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
4 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently July 2012
4 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77 · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78O (§ 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)
Relies on Cort v. Ash · Seville Industrial Machinery Corp. v. Southmost Machinery Corp. · Colonial Realty Corp. v. Bache & Co. · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · In Re Catanella and EF Hutton and Co.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.