Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 609 NE2D 3 - Babin v. State

Babin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2017

4 state decisions

20199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Norton v. State · Pyle v. State · Sheckles v. State · Peak v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “With respect to a charge under IC 35-41-2-4 [aiding, inducing, or causing an offensel, IC 35-41-5-1 [attempt], or IC 35-41-5-2 [conspiracy], it is a defense that the person who engaged in the prohibited conduct voluntarily abandoned his effort to commit the underlying crime and voluntarily prevented its commission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[albandonment relieves an accused of criminal responsibility when 'a criminal enterprise is eut short by a change of heart, desertion of eriminal purpose, change of behavior, and rising revulsion for the harm intended.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.