Ag v. Sg’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2000
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jefferson County Department of Social Services v. D.A.G. · City & County of Denver v. Juvenile Court · In Re People in Interest of LB · Guggenmos v. Tom Searl-Frank McCue, Inc. · 37 Colo. App. 209 - People in Interest of Rm & Wm
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“one of the strongest presumptions known to the law”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. N.A.H. v. S.L.S. · Nah v. Sls“(1) The general assembly declares that the purposes of this title [19] are: (a) To secure for each child subject to these provisions such care and guidance, preferably in his own home, as will best serve his welfare and the interests of society; (b) To preserve and strengthen family ties whenever possible, including improvement of home environment; (2) To carry out these purposes, the provisions of this title shall be liberally construed to serve the welfare of children and the best interests of society.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.