Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 609 S.E.2d 471 - In Re DA

In Re DA’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2012
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Troxel v. Granville · Owenby v. Young · 143 N.C. App. 712 - In Re Eades · 161 N.C. App. 650 - In Re Howell · In Re Alexander

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where a movant fails to give the required notice [under N.C. Gen.Stat. § 7B-1106.1], prejudicial error exists, and a new hearing is required.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re CSB · 194 N.C. App. 195 - In re C.S.B.
  2. “Because DSS failed to give the statutorily required notice, prejudicial error exists and a new hearing is warranted.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re CSB · 194 N.C. App. 195 - In re C.S.B.
  3. “This Court has held the General Assembly's use of the word `shall' establishes a mandate, and failure to comply with the statutory mandate is reversible error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re HDF

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.