Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 609 So. 2d 1209 - McLemore v. Fox

609 So. 2d 1209 - McLemore v. Fox’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 2016

6 state decisions

40199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Villaume v. Villaume · 351 So. 2d 1199 - Hebert v. Hebert · Lee v. City of Baton Rouge · Cooper v. Olinde · 565 So. 2d 1031 - McLemore v. Fox

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A written judgment may be revised before it is signed thus eliminating many possibilities of error or misunderstanding. In the event a substantive error nevertheless creeps into the written judgment the aggrieved party has recourse to a timely application for a new trial or a timely appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.