Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

609 So. 2d 177

Hargrove v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 16, 1992

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-12-16

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1993

1 state decisions

Relies on 525 So. 2d 1022 - Caraffi v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-12-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm Belton Hargrove’s judgment and sentence. We remand for correction of the written judgment.

¶2As to count one of the information, the trial court orally adjudicated Hargrove guilty of possession of methamphetamine, a third-degree felony, which was consistent with the jury verdict. However, the written judgment reflects that Hargrove was adjudicated guilty of possession of methamphetamine with intent to sell, a second-degree felony. Although the parties did not raise this issue, we remand this case to the trial court for correction of the written judgment to conform to the oral pronouncement. See Maynard v. State, 525 So.2d 1022 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and HALL and PARKER, JJ., concur.
/609/so2d/177 · .json · Public domain