Robbins v. Section 3 Property Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2006
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Roberts · Davis v. Davis · City of Tampa v. Palmer · Camp Phosphate Co. v. Allen · Powell v. Kelly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t is well established that where the right or remedy is equitable in nature there is no right to a jury trial. Hawkins v. Rellim Inv. Co., 92 Fla. 784 , 110 So. 350 (Fla.1926); Hathorne v. Panama Park Co., 44 Fla. 194 , 32 So. 812 (Fla.1902); Hughes v. Hannah, 39 Fla. 365 , 22 So. 613 (Fla. 1897); Wiggins v. Williams, 36 Fla. 637 , 18 So. 859 (Fla.1896). Thus, actions in equity do not fall within the protection of Article I, Section 22, of the Florida Constitution (1968) guaranteeing the right to a jury trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Is there a right to a jury trial under Article I, Section 22 of the Florida Constitution (1968), in a tax action to challenge a Property Appraiser’s grant of an agricultural exemption?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.