Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 609 So. 2d 74 - Jacques v. Jacques

609 So. 2d 74 - Jacques v. Jacques’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bibby v. United States · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · 473 So. 2d 703 - Boynton v. State · 478 So. 2d 351 - State v. Schmidt · RBS v. Capri

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is not the function of an appellate court to cull the underlying record in an effort to locate findings and underlying reasons which would support the order.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “include findings of fact relative to the factors enumerated in subsection (2) supporting an award or denial of alimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.