609 So. 2d 993 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 1995
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 349 So. 2d 311 - State v. Anderson · State v. Broussard · 542 So. 2d 23 - State v. Junior · 475 So. 2d 791 - State v. Lambert · 580 So. 2d 448 - State v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“C. This Section shall not be applicable in cases where more than five years have elapsed since the expiration of the maximum sentence, or sentences, of the previous conviction, or convictions, and the time of the commission of the last felony for which he has been convicted. In computing the period of time as provided herein, any period of servitude by a person in a penal institution, within or without the state, shall not be included in the computation of any of said five year periods.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“La.R.S. 15:529.1(C) prohibits the use of a conviction where more than five years have elapsed between the expiration of the maximum sentence on the prior conviction and the commission of the present offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.