Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 609 SW2D 128 - Seay v. Commonwealth

Seay v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
3
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 2018

20 state decisions

701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kimbrough v. Commonwealth · Timmons v. Commonwealth · Griffin v. Commonwealth · Eversole v. Commonwealth · Harris v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The proper procedure for challenging the sufficiency of evidence on one specific count is an objection to the giving of an instruction on that charge." Id.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “insufficient to apprise the trial court of the precise nature of the objection.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.