Gill v. Maul’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
March 2015
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12131 (§ 201 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the ADA and Executive Law § 296 use the same legal standards to establish discrimination”). The Court therefore will not separately address Plaintiff’s state-law claim. . In his Memorandum, Plaintiff argues that the Court should apply a mixed-motive analysis to his claim, rather than the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework, because he has presented”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.