Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 ALA 53 - May v. Duke

May v. Duke’s Empirical Analysis

1878

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 1941
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 1941

8 state decisions

2018781880189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lee v. Lee · Hutton v. Williams · Walls & Wire v. Grigsby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““until satisfaction is made to the cestui que trust. The debt contracted by the borrower [by way of the devastavit] is his individual property, unless the cestui quo trust elects to treat it as assets, and when the trustee collects it, in the absence of an election by the cestui que trust, it is his own debt he collects.” May v. Duke, 61 Ala. 53, 57 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.