¶1This is an action on a promissory note, the execution of which is admitted in the answer. The only defense is, that there was an extension of the time of payment. The findings are all in favor of the plaintiff, and no part of the evidence is brought up in the transcript. There is no error apparent in the proceedings, and the judgment is affirmed.
61 Cal. 620
Howard v. Jackson
Decided October 28, 1882
California Supreme Court · decided 1882-10-28
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Alameda. Crane, J. Action on a promissory note. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1882-10-28
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 1977
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →