61 Cal. 88
Decided July 25, 1882
California Supreme Court · decided 1882-07-25
Bolee, J. The land was described in the deed referred to in the opinion as the “Sylvester Bryant Tract of the Museupiabe Banch.” It was objected to the deed when offered in evidence that the words “ and to all owners and claimants known and unknown” were erased in two places and also the words “two dollars,” but these words do not appear in the copy of the deed in the bill of exceptions.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1884
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1882-07-25
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The description of the premises in the tax deed appears to us to be sufficient.
¶2It does not appear by the record that there were any erasures in the deed. The copy set out in the bill of exceptions discloses none, and there is no evidence that there were any. The motion for a new trial may have been granted on the ground that no erasures appeared upon the face of the deed.
¶3Order affirmed.