Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 CAL2D 491 - In Re Nash

In Re Nash’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
August 1996
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1996 · most notably Anders v. California (1967), 25 Cal. 3d 436 - People v. Wende (1979)

8 federal appellate · 54 state decisions

2801964197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Douglas v. People of State of California · Coppedge v. United States · Beck v. United States · Gilliam v. United States · Federal Communications Commission v. WJR, Goodwill Station, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he requirement of the Douglas case is met ... when ... counsel is appointed to represent the defendant on appeal, thoroughly studies the record, consults with the defendant and trial counsel, and conscientiously concludes that there are no meritorious grounds of appeal. If thereafter the appellate court is satisfied from its own review of the record in the light of any points raised by the defendant personally that counsel's assessment of the record is correct, it need not appoint another counsel to represent the defendant on appeal and may properly decide the appeal without oral argument.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “. . . he could find no meritorious grounds of appeal and refuse to file a brief or argue the case orally.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.