Anderson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1943
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently July 1995 · most notably 100 Cal. App. 2d 101 - People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. McCullough (1950), 48 Cal. 2d 189 - People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Russell (1957)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 20 Cal. 2d 751 - Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co. · Rose v. State of California · Neel v. Mannings, Inc. · Ethel D. Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission · Gibson Properties Co. v. City of Oakland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““What they saw there is evidence and from its very nature is not incorporated in the written record. We are required to presume that evidence not included in the record supports the verdict and judgment. (Haase v. Central Union H. S. Dist., 27 Cal.App.2d 319 [ 80 P.2d 1044 ].) Evidence obtained by the trier of fact viewing the premises has been held sufficient to support a judgment.” (Citations.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.