Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 COLO 104 - Hurt v. Schneider

Hurt v. Schneider’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
4
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

1 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2009

1 district · 10 state decisions

501916192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. King · Bailey's Adm'r v. Campbell · Smith v. Specht · Petty v. Mays · Dempsey v. . Kipp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The lessee is let into possession of the demised premises, and holds them for the benefit of both the lessor and himself. During the term of the lease their interests in regard to the premises are, in many respects, identical. The relation implies a fealty on the part of the tenant to his landlord from which spring well-known legal duties not prescribed in the lease.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.