Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 CONNAPP 175 - Janik v. Janik

Janik v. Janik’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
September 2022
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently September 2022 · most notably In re Daniel C. (2001), 108 Conn. App. 813 - Watrous v. Watrous (2008)

43 state decisions

380200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fussell v. Price · Williams v. United States · Ridgeway v. Ridgeway · Knock v. Knock · Schult v. Schult

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(Internal quotation marks omitted.) Kelly v. Kelly, 54 Conn. App. 50 , 55 , 732 A.2d 808 (1999). Among the various factors the court may consider when determining the best interest of the child are the parties' parenting skills . . . The court may also take into account the recommendations of the . . . child's guardian ad litem. See Schult v. Schult, supra, 779 (the guardian ad litem is the representative of the child's best interests').”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the court may at any time make or modify any proper order regarding . . . custody and visitation if it has jurisdiction . . . according to its best judgment upon the facts of the case and subject to such conditions and limitations as it deems equitable”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.