In re Stanley D.’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
85
cited by 85 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
85 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In re Luis C. · 6 Conn. App. 194 - In re Migdalia M. · 29 Conn. App. 112 - In re Michael M. · In re Eden F. · In re Hector L.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n the adjudicatory phase, the court may rely on events occurring after the date of the filing of the petition to terminate parental rights when considering the issue of whether the degree of rehabilitation is sufficient to foresee that the parent may resume a useful role in the child's life within a reasonable time.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage“An inquiry regarding personal rehabilitation requires us to obtain a historical perspective of the respondent's child-caring and parenting abilities.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Section 17a-112 (c)(3)(B) [Rev. 1999] requires the court to determine whether the degree of personal rehabilitation . . . encourage[s] the belief that within a reasonable time . . . such parent could assume a responsible position in the life of the child. . . . CT Page 3445 Personal rehabilitation refers to the reasonable foreseeability of the restoration of a parent to his or her former constructive and useful role as a parent, not merely the ability to manage his or her own life. . . . "Rehabilitation does not require the parent to be able to assume full responsibility for a child without the use of available support programs. . . . An inquiry regarding personal rehabilitation requires us to obtain a historical perspective of the respondent's child-caring and parenting abilities. . . . What constitutes a reasonable time is a factual determination that must be made on a case-by-case basis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.