Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 F.1d 24 - Coe v. Aiken

Coe v. Aiken’s Empirical Analysis

61 F. 24 · 1893

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
June 1920
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on In Re Niagara Falls & Whirlpool Railway Co. · Chambers v. City of St. Louis · People Ex Rel. Herrick v. Smith · Swan v. Williams · Matter Appl'n of E.B.W. M. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The nature of the use for which land is to be taken necessarily appears on the face of the proceeding; and, if it is not a public one, the condemnation cannot be sustained, no matter' what the Legislature may have declared.” Coe v. Aiken (C. C.) 61 Fed. 24 , 32.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.