Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 F.1d 293 - Norton v. Eagle Automatic Can Co.

Norton v. Eagle Automatic Can Co.’s Empirical Analysis

61 F. 293 · 1894

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
September 1905
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Cochrane v. Deener · Overman Wheel Co. v. Elliott Hickory Cycle Co. · Edison Electric Light Co. v. Beacon Vacuum Pump & Electrical Co. · Lockwood v. Faber · Norton v. Agle Automatic Can Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““While the beaten path of precedent is undoubtedly the safest road for nisi prius courts to follow, a blind adherence thereto, without considering the changed facts, would often lead to great injustice, which it should be the aim of every court to avoid. A safe, just, and equitable rule would be to require the defendant in such cases to produce new evidence of such a clear and positive character as to justify a well-founded belief that upon the final hearing the full proofs might be such as to warrant a different construction of complainant’s patent.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.