Hendriksen v. Weedin

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Nov. 16, 1932.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1932-11-16

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1932

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States Stapf v. Coris

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1932-11-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Wright & Wright and Hugh C. Todd, all of Seattle, Wash., for appellant.

¶2Anthony Savage, U. S. Atty., and Hamlet P. Dodd, Asst. U. S. 'Atty., both of Seattle, Wash. (John F. Dunton, U. S. Immigration Service, of Seattle, Wash., on the brief), for appellee.

¶3Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges.

¶4WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

¶5The order of reversal entered November 7, 1932, is vacated. The opinion filed on that date is withdrawn, and the order of the trial court is affirmed upon the authority of the decision of the Supreme Court in United States ex rel. Leo Stapf v. Edward Corsi, 53 S. Ct. 40, 77 L. Ed.-, rendered November 7, 1932.