Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

61 F.2d 1031

Docket No. 33.

Hurn v. Oursler

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Nov. 7, 1932.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1932-11-07

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1932

1 federal appellate ·

4 counsel of record

Relies on Standard Paint Company v. Trinidad Asphalt Manufacturing Company · United States Expansion Bolt Co. v. H. G. Kroncke Hardware Co. · Ingrassia v. A. C. W. Mfg. Corp.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1932-11-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Lorenz & Lorenz, of New York City (Joseph Lorenz, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

¶2Hays, St. John, Abramson & Sohulman, of New York City (Arthur Garfield Hays and Alan S. Hays, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee Oursler.

¶3O’Brien, Malevinsky & Driscoll, of New York City (Arthur P. Driscoll, Benjamin Pepper, and George D. Bradford, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellees Albert Lewis and Sam H. Harris.

¶4Paul N. Turner, of New York City, for appellee Lowell Brentano.

¶5Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

/61/f2d/1031 · .json · Public domain