Peter Barceloux Co. v. Buffum’s Empirical Analysis
61 F.2d 145 · 1932
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1985
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 110
Relies on Stellwagen v. Clum · Tilghman v. Proctor · McGowan v. Parish · Gunn v. United States · Security Warehousing Co. v. Hand
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The most that can be said of the transaction is that it was a preference, and a preference per se cannot be fraudulent solely because it is designed to, and does in fact, defer other creditors to the preferred creditor, (at page 149).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re DeReus
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.