Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 F.3d 20 - Mesa v. United States

Mesa v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

61 F.3d 20 · 1995

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
5
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably University of South Alabama v. American Tobacco Co. (1999), Grayson v. K Mart Corp. (1996)

15 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

2101995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Jetco Electronic Industries, Inc. v. Gardiner · Fassett v. Delta Kappa Epsilon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Jetco allows an exception to the finality rule when 'a series of court orders, considered together, terminate[d] the litigation as effectively as a formal order.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[B]ecause plaintiffs never sought or received a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) certification and, thus, never received a final decision, plaintiffs had nothing to appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[r]esolution of this appeal is controlled by Ryan v. Occidental Petroleum Corp., 577 F.2d 298 (5th Cir.1978).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.