United States v. Willis’s Empirical Analysis
61 F.3d 526 · 1995
Citation profile
33 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently June 2011 · most notably United States v. Baker (1996), United States of America v. Noe Mancillas (1999)
33 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Lefkowitz · North Star Steel Co. v. Thomas · Nebraska v. Wyoming · Midland Central Appraisal District v. Midland Industrial Service Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“expert testimony on medical or psychological analysis of a defendant's mental processes, but not law enforcement testimony that does not depend on such analysis.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'Whether the search remained within the boundaries of the consent is a question of fact to be determined from the totality of all the circumstances.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the defendant claims a lack of guilty knowledge and there are facts and evidence that support an inference of deliberate ignorance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.