Creative Technology, Ltd. v. Aztech System Pte, Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis
61 F.3d 696 · 1995
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 16 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Does Thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corporation (2000), Murray v. British Broadcasting Corp. (1996)
24 federal appellate · 16 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 101 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 106 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 501 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1338 · 45 U.S.C. § 56 (Federal Employers' Liability Act) · 46 U.S.C. § 30104 (Merchant Marine Act of 1920 (Jones Act))
Relies on Gulf Oil Corporation v. Gilbert · Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno · Tompkins v. Texas · TWENTIETH CENTURY MUSIC CORP. Et Al. v. AIKEN · Baltimore or Co v. Kepner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The public interest factors include: (1) administrative difficulties flowing from court congestion; (2) imposition of jury duty on the people of a community that has no relation to the litigation; (3) local interest in having localized controversies decided at home; (4) the interest in having a diversity case tried in a forum familiar with the law that governs the action; (5) the avoidance of unnecessary problems in conflicts of law.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“[A] forum will be inadequate only where the remedy provided is `so clearly inadequate or unsatisfactory, that it is no remedy at all.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“The private interest factors include: (1) relative ease of access to sources of proof; (2) the availability of compulsory process for attendance of unwilling witnesses, and cost of obtaining attendance of willing witnesses; (3) possibility of viewing subject premises; (4) all other factors that render trial of the case expeditious and inexpensive.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.