Atkins v. Shalala

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued and Submitted July 14, 1995.

Decided Aug. 9, 1995.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-08-09

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 1998

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Sandin v. Conner · Conner v. Sakai · 837 F. Supp. 318 - Atkins v. Shalala

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-08-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Ralph Wilborn, Eugene, OR, for plaintiff-appellant.

¶2Richard H. Wetmore, Asst. Regional Counsel, Dept, of Health & Human Services, Seattle, WA, for defendant-appellee.

¶3Before: HUG, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER,* District Judge.

¶5ORDER

¶6We determine that the opinion of the district court, Atkins v. Shalala, 837 F.Supp. 318 (D.Or.1993), is correct in all aspects and it is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

¶7The Judgment of the district court is affirmed.

¶8AFFIRMED.