Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

61 F.3d 899

Docket No. 94-2620.

Floyd v. County of Cumberland

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: April 25, 1995. Decided: July 26, 1995.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-07-26

Relies on Ka Bennett v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company Bg Lp G J Je

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-07-26

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Helen A. Floyd, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Bradford Taylor, Philip Marshall Van Hoy, Van Hoy, Reutlinger & Taylor, Charlotte, NC; D. James Jones, Jr., Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing her federal and state law claims on abstention grounds and for failure to adequately state a claim. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Floyd v. County of Cumberland, No. CA-94-6-3-H3 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/61/f3d/899 · .json · Public domain