61 F3d 900 Parker v. Jefferson Dp & a Wm D Bj City

61 F.3d 900

Monroe Roosevelt PARKER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
Captain JEFFERSON, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney, City of
Hampton; Lieutenant McCoy; Jim Bonnaker; D.P. Smith,
Investigator, College of William & Mary; A. Banwell,
Detective, Hampton Police Department; W.M. Summerell,
Virginia Beach Police Department; Ramona D. Taylor,
Assistant Commonwealth Attorney; Major Adams; B.J.
Roberts, Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees,
CITY of Virginia Beach; Virginia Beach Police Department;
Virginia Beach Sheriff's Department; Virginia
Beach Correctional Center; Hampton
Sheriff's Department; Hampton
City Jail, Defendants.

No. 95-6472.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: July 21, 1995.

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Monroe Roosevelt Parker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Gary Alvin Bryant, Willcox & Savage, Norfolk, VA; Alison Paige Landry, Office of The Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA; Richard David Caplan, City Attorney's Office, Hampton, VA; Richard Jay Beaver, City Attorney's Office, Virginia Beach, VA, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.


view counter

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.* We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Parker v. Jefferson, No. CA-94-1026-2 (E.D.Va. Mar. 17, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.



The district court also correctly dismissed without prejudice Appellant's claims against Ramona D. Taylor because Appellant failed to serve her properly with process