Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

61 F.3d 901

Docket No. 95-6487.

Spears v. D Rose Lpn

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted May 18, 1995. Decided July 28, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States v. Shafer

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Larry D. Spears, appellant pro se. John Britton Russell, SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, VA; Karen Lynn Lebo, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA, for appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Spears v. Rose, No. CA-90-1183-AM (E.D.Va. Mar. 7, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/61/f3d/901 · .json · Public domain