Botelho v. Buscone’s Empirical Analysis
2023
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 341 · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Grogan v. Garner · State of New Hampshire v. State of Maine · Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass. · Scarano v. Central R. Co. of New Jersey · Stern v. Marshall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“failure to provide any creditable argument for not complying with the court's first [discovery] - 7 - order, repeated failures to respond to discovery requests, attempts to obfuscate issues before the court, and continued noncompliance despite the fact that the court had already imposed the lesser sanction of shifting fees.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Buscone v. Botelho“[A]n adversary proceeding is a subsidiary lawsuit within the larger framework of a bankruptcy case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“arguably sarcastic and evasive responses to interrogatories.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Buscone v. Botelho
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.