United States v. Ray’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3005 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 848 (§ 408 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Olano · United States v. Bagley · Kyles v. Whitley · Johnson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There may well be cases in which ... knowledge of an ongoing conspiracy and actions which further that conspiracy - are sufficient standing alone to support a reasonable inference that the defendant sought to further the conspiracy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.