Jackson v. Brooks

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided May 2, 2003

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2003-05-02

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2004

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2003-05-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Cecil Edward Jackson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jackson v. Brooks, No. CA-02-68-2 (E.D.Va. Nov. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the *899 court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.