Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 FLA 162 - Elsberry v. Sexton

Elsberry v. Sexton’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
states following
April 2009
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently April 2009

18 state decisions

501911192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dung v. . Parker · Hamilton v. Thirston · Dunphy v. Ryan · Maloy v. Boyett · Cagger v. . Lansing

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Where a contract is for the sale of lands, or any interest therein, and is not in writing, no action at law can ever be maintained upon it. Part performance of such a contract is a ground of relief in equity only, and there on the principle of relieving from fraud. [Citing numerous cases.]"”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.