Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 FLA 19 - Coatney v. State

Coatney v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
November 1990
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1990

8 state decisions

30191119201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mattox v. United States · Hopkins v. State · 50 La. Ann. 94 - State v. Ashworth · Goff v. State · Gardner v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hether a proper predicate has been laid for the introduction of evidence of a dying declaration is to be determined primarily by the court, and, when the evidence is admitted, its weight and credibility are for the jury to determine.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.