Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 FLA 720 - Putnal v. Walker

Putnal v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
November 2002
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2002

5 state decisions

301911192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sims v. Everhardt · Green v. . Green · McCarthy v. Nicrosi · Gillespie v. Bailey · Booby v. McKenney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The right of an infant to avoid his contract is one conferred by law for his protection against his own improvidence and the designs of others; and, though its exercise is not infrequently the occasion of injury to others who have in good faith dealt with him, this is a consequence which they might have avoided by declining to enter into the contract. It is the policy of the law to discourage adults from contracting with infants * * [Emphasis supplied.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.