State v. Walters’s Empirical Analysis
1940
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 1990
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Norris v. State of Alabama · Pierre v. State of Louisiana · Ball v. United States · Hale v. Commonwealth of Kentucky · Walter v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"On a motion to quash a jury panel the burden of showing substantial actual or presumptive prejudice to the rights of defendant rests on the moving party and must be established by a preponderance of the proofs. ( Morris v. State, 62 Okl.Cr. 337 , 71 P.2d 514, 517 ; Norris v. Alabama, 294 U.S. 587 , 55 S.Ct. 579 , 79 L.Ed. 1074 .) We feel that appellant has failed to sustain the burden of proof cast upon him, and that his motion to quash was properly denied." 61 Idaho at 347 , 102 P.2d at 286 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Silcox“`equal protection of the laws' to anyone falling within that class, ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Paz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.