61 Ill. 2d 298 - People v. Gooding’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
55 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably 128 Ill. 2d 540 - People v. Turner (1989), 92 Ill. 2d 101 - People v. Reimolds (1982)
55 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 10 Ill. 2d 556 - The People v. House · 46 Ill. 2d 82 - The PEOPLE v. Young · 18 Ill. 2d 260 - The PEOPLE v. Rankins · 34 Ill. 2d 179 - The People v. Petropoulos · 58 Ill. 2d 202 - People v. Shields
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(a) Every person in custody in this State for an alleged offense shall be tried by the court having jurisdiction within 120 days from the date he was taken into custody unless delay is occasioned by the defendant * ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Thus, any continuance which is allowed during the 120-day statutory period constitutes a delay. When it is clear that the continuance is granted at the request of the defendant, then it is a delay occasioned by the defendant’ within the meaning of the statute, and a new statutory period commences to run from the date to which the continuance is granted. If it is not clear that the continuance is attributable to the defendant, the court will inquire into the circumstances surrounding the granting of the continuance to ascertain if the delay has been occasioned by the defendant.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Jordan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.