Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 KAN 739 - State v. Williams

State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1900

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
5
states following
May 1964
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 1964

15 state decisions

501900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Carroll · Texas v. White · Generes v. Bonnemer · The People v. . Cook · State ex rel. Knowlton v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The acts of a de facto judge cannot be collaterally attacked, and his right to the office is not open to question except in a direct proceeding brought by the state; and this is true in a case where the officer is incapable of holding the office.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.